(1) 1 Die Verjährung schließt die Ahndung der Tat und die Anordnung von Maßnahmen (§ 11 Abs. 1 Nr. 8) aus. 2 § 76a Absatz 2 bleibt unberührt. Lesen Sie § 78 StGB kostenlos in der Gesetzessammlung von emckesson.com mit über Gesetzen und Vorschriften. StGB § 78 i.d.F. Allgemeiner Teil. Fünfter Abschnitt: Verjährung. Erster Titel: Verfolgungsverjährung. § 78 Verjährungsfrist . (1) 1Die Verjährung.
Verjährungsfristen im StrafrechtStGB § 78 i.d.F. Allgemeiner Teil. Fünfter Abschnitt: Verjährung. Erster Titel: Verfolgungsverjährung. § 78 Verjährungsfrist . (1) 1Die Verjährung. Verfolgungsverjährung nach § 78 StGB: Wann verjährt eine Straftat? den in den Paragraphen des Strafgesetzbuches festgelegten möglichen Höchststrafen. Wie lange dauert es, bis Verjährung nach § 78 StGB eintritt? Kann die Dauer unterbrochen werden? Was kann ich unter Ruhen der Verjährung nach § 78b StGB.
Paragraph 78 Stgb Rechtsprechung zu § 78 StGB VideoParagraf 78 Section 68e Termination or stay of supervision. Section Attempt to M Stargames false testimony. Section h Definitions. Die sogenannte Verfolgungsverjährung nach Paragraph 78 des Strafgesetzbuches (§ 78 StGB).. Im Strafrecht gibt es zwei Arten der Verjährung: Die Verfolgungsverjährung schließt die Ahndung einer bestimmten Tat nach einer definierten Zeitdauer aus. In diesem Fall ist die Verjährung nach dem Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) ein Verfahrenshindernis. Paragraph § 78 des Strafgesetzbuchs - StGB (Verjährungsfrist) mit zusätzlichem Recherchematerial wie Formularen, Präsentationen, PDFs und anderen Webseiten. Paragraph 78 (Russian: Параграф 78; also stylized as: § 78) is a Russian film by Mikhail Khleborodov released in The film was split into two parts Paragraph 78, Punkt 1 released on February 22, , and Paragraph 78, Punkt 2 released on March 29, § 78 StGB Mitwirkung am Selbstmord - Strafgesetzbuch - Gesetz, Kommentar und Diskussionsbeiträge - JUSLINE Österreich. Section 78 Limitation period (1) The imposition of a penalty and the ordering of measures (section 11 (1) no. 8) are ruled out following expiry of the limitation period. Section 76a (2) remains unaffected. (2) Serious criminal offences under section (murder under specific aggravating circumstances) are not subject to the statute of limitations.
The time in which the perpetrator is held in custody in an institution pursuant to an order of a public authority shall not be calculated into the term of the prohibition.
If a measure of reform and prevention involving deprivation of liberty was ordered collateral to imprisonment, the term shall be calculated beginning on the day the measure was completed.
In doing so consideration shall be given in particular to:. If the law provides for an increased minimum term of imprisonment, the minimum fine in cases covered by sentence 1 is determined by the minimum prescribed term of imprisonment; thirty daily rates shall thus correspond to one month imprisonment.
In case of a fine the same shall apply to the maximum number of daily rates;. A circumstance which alone or together with other circumstances justifies the assumption that the case is less serious and is simultaneously a special statutory mitigating circumstance under Section 49, may only be considered once.
However the court may order that the credit be withheld in whole or in part if it is not justified in light of the conduct of the convicted person after the act.
Subsection 1 shall correspondingly apply to any other deprivation of liberty undergone abroad. If a foreign punishment or deprivation of liberty is to be credited, the court shall determine the rate in its discretion.
It may not be more lenient that the other applicable norms permit. In addition, collateral punishments or consequences and measures Section 11 subsection 1 , no.
However, the court may also separately impose a fine; if in such cases a fine is to be imposed for more than one crime, then an aggregate fine should to that extent be imposed.
In all other cases the aggregate punishment shall be formed by increasing the highest punishment incurred and, in the case of different kinds of punishment, by increasing the punishment most severe in nature.
In doing so, the personal characteristics of the perpetrator and the individual crimes shall be comprehensively evaluated. A previous conviction shall be deemed to be the judgment in the previous proceeding in which the underlying factual findings could last be reviewed.
Particularly to be considered are the personality of the convicted person, his previous history, the circumstances of his act, his conduct after the act, his living conditions and the effects which can be expected as a result of the suspension.
In making the decision the efforts of the convicted person to make restitution for the harm caused by the act should particularly be considered.
It shall not be excluded by the crediting of time served in remand detention or any other deprivation of liberty.
It may not exceed five years nor be less than two years. It may subsequently be reduced to the minimum or prolonged to the maximum before its expiration.
No unreasonable demands should thereby be made on the convicted person. The court should impose a condition pursuant to sentence 1, nos.
No unreasonable demands should thereby be made on the way the convicted person conducts his life. With the approval of the court he shall supervise the fulfillment of the conditions and instructions as well as the offers and promises.
He shall report on the way the convicted person is conducting his life at intervals determined by the court. He shall inform the court as to gross or persistent violations of the conditions, instructions, offers or promises.
It may give him instructions concerning his functions under subsection 3. Sentence 1, no. In cases pursuant to no. If a suspended execution of punishment is revoked, however, the court can credit accomplishments, which the convicted person has rendered in fulfillment of conditions under Section 56b subsection 2 , sent.
Section 56f subsection 3 , sent. The revocation shall only be permissible within one year after the expiration of the term of probation and six months after the judgment becomes final.
To be considered in making the decision shall be, in particular, the personality of the convicted person, his previous history, the circumstances of his act, the importance of the legal interest threatened in case of recidivism, the conduct of the convicted person while serving his sentence, his living conditions and the effects which can be expected as a result of the suspension.
If the convicted person has served at least one year of his punishment before the remainder is suspended and probation granted, then the court shall, as a rule, place him under the supervision and guidance of a probation officer for all or a part of the term of probation.
Sections 56a subsection 2 , sent. If imprisonment for life has been imposed as an aggregate punishment, then the individual crimes shall be comprehensively evaluated in determining the particular gravity of the guilt Section 57a subsection 1 , sent.
If the aggregate punishment is not suspended and probation granted, then Section 56f subsection 3 , shall apply accordingly.
A warning with punishment reserved shall not be permissible collaterally to measures of reform and prevention. It may not exceed three years nor be less than one year.
No unreasonable demands may thereby be made on the way the warned person conducts his life; the conditions and instructions under sentence 1, nos.
Sections 56c subsections 3 and 4 , and Section 56e shall apply accordingly. The court shall dispense with punishment when the consequences of the act which have befallen the perpetrator are so serious that the imposition of punishment would be obviously inappropriate.
This shall not apply when the perpetrator has incurred imprisonment of more than one year for the act. A measure of reform and prevention may not be ordered when it is disproportionate to the significance of the acts committed by, or expected to be committed by the perpetrator, as well as to the degree of danger he poses.
If someone committed an unlawful act and at the time lacked capacity to be adjudged guilty Section 20 or was in a state of diminished capacity Section 21 , the court shall order placement in a psychiatric hospital if a comprehensive evaluation of the perpetrator and his act reveals that, as a result of his condition serious unlawful acts can be expected of him and he therefore presents a danger to the general public.
If someone has committed two crimes of the type indicated in sentence 1, as a result of which he has incurred, respectively, imprisonment for at least two years, and if he is sentenced for one or more of these acts to a fixed term of imprisonment of at least three years, then the court may, under the provision indicated in subsection 1 , no.
Subsections 1 and 2 shall remain unaffected. If remand detention or another deprivation of liberty is credited against a term of imprisonment, it shall qualify as a served punishment within the meaning of subsection 1 , no.
A prior act shall not be considered if more than five years have passed between it and the subsequent act. Time in which the perpetrator has been held in custody in an institution by order of a public authority shall not be included in the term.
An act upon which judgment was passed outside of the territorial area of application of this law shall be equivalent to an act upon which judgment is passed within this area if it would be an intentional act under the German criminal law, or, in cases under subsection 3 , it would be one of the crimes of the type indicated in subsection 3 , sentence 1.
This shall not apply if the court has made an order pursuant to Section 67d subsection 5 , sent. If the remainder of punishment is not suspended, the execution of the measure shall continue; the court may nevertheless order the execution of the punishment if circumstances relating to the convicted person make it seem advisable.
The court may further vacate a decision under subsection 2 , if it subsequently appears that no success will be achieved with the execution of the measures named in subsection 1.
There shall be no suspension if the perpetrator still must serve a term of imprisonment which was imposed at the same time as the measure and not suspended with a grant of probation.
If that is not the case, it suspends the execution of the placement and grants probation; supervision of conduct shall commence with the suspension.
Time in which the perpetrator has been held in custody in an institution by order of a public authority shall not be credited to the term.
The court shall order its execution if the objective of the measure still requires the placement. If the objective of the measure has not been attained but special circumstances justify the expectation that it may also be attained by suspension, then the court shall suspend execution of the placement and grant probation; supervision of conduct shall commence with the suspension.
If the objective of the measure has been attained, the court shall declare it as having been satisfied.
The term runs from the commencement of the placement. If a measure involving deprivation of liberty is executed before a collaterally ordered term of imprisonment, then the maximum term shall be extended by the length of the term of imprisonment to the extent the time of execution of the measure is credited towards the punishment.
Supervision of conduct shall commence with the suspension. Supervision of conduct shall commence upon satisfaction of the measure. The measure has thereby been satisfied.
Supervision of conduct shall commence upon release from the execution of the placement. It shall make this review before the expiration of specified terms.
It may also set terms within the statutory limits for review, before the expiration of which an application for review shall be inadmissible. If the court refuses the suspension, the terms shall commence anew with this decision.
If the court orders placement in an institution for withdrawal treatment, then any previous order of the measure shall be considered satisfied.
Section 56c subsection 3 , shall be applicable. The court may shorten the maximum length. If the convicted person subsequently declares his consent, then the court shall fix the further duration of the supervision of conduct.
Section 68e subsection 4 , shall otherwise apply. Time, during which the convicted person is a fugitive, is hiding, or is held in custody in an institution by order of a public authority, shall not be credited against its length.
The court may subsequently make, modify or vacate decisions pursuant to Sections 68a subsections 1 and 5 , 68b, 68c subsection 1 , sent.
Termination shall be permissible at the earliest after expiration of the minimum statutory period. If the court refuses to terminate supervision of conduct, then the term shall commence a new with the decision.
This shall not apply when a measure of reform and prevention involving deprivation of liberty is executed immediately following the service of the sentence.
Supervision of conduct shall not terminate before the expiration of the term of probation. The term of probation shall not then be credited to the period of supervision of conduct.
Further review pursuant to Section 62 shall not be required. A permanent bar may be ordered if it can be expected that the statutory maximum term will not suffice to avert the danger posed by the perpetrator.
If the perpetrator has no permission to drive, then only a bar shall be ordered. However, it may not be less than three months.
The time of a provisional withdrawal ordered because of the act shall be credited to the term of the bar, to the extent it has run following the pronouncement of the judgment in which the factual determinations on which the measure is based could last be reviewed.
This action shall be permissible at the earliest when the bar has been in effect three months, or a year in cases pursuant to subsection 3 ; subsection 5 , sentence 2 and subsection 6 shall apply accordingly.
The right to drive motor vehicles in Germany is forfeited when the decision becomes final. During the bar neither domestic permission to drive, nor the right to make use of foreign permission to drive, may be granted.
Prohibition of Engagement in a Profession. The order of prohibition of engagement in a profession may be permanent if it can be expected that the statutory maximum term will not suffice to avert the danger posed by the perpetrator.
It may, however, not be less than three months. The time of a provisional prohibition of engagement in a profession ordered because of the act shall be credited to the term of prohibition, to the extent it has run following the pronouncement of the judgment in which the factual determinations on which the measure is based could last be examined.
Time during which the perpetrator is held in custody in an institution by order of a public authority shall not be credited.
The time of a provisional prohibition of engagement in a profession shall be credited to the term of prohibition within the framework of Section 70 subsection 4 , sent.
The term of probation shall be extended, however, by the time in which a term of imprisonment or a measure involving deprivation of liberty is executed, which was imposed or ordered against the convicted person because of the act.
In this respect priority shall be given among a number of suitable measures to those which least burden the perpetrator. Before the conclusion of the execution of a measure the court shall order the execution of the next, respectively, if its objective still requires the placement.
Section 67c subsection 2 , sentences 4 and 5 shall be applicable. This shall not apply to the extent that a claim by the aggrieved party has arisen out of the act the satisfaction of which would deprive the perpetrator or inciter or accessory of the value of that which was acquired by virtue of the act.
It may also extend to objects which the perpetrator or inciter or accessory has acquired through alienation of an acquired object, as a replacement for its destruction, damage or seizure or on the basis of an acquired right.
To the extent that the forfeiture of a particular object is impossible due to the nature of what was acquired or for some other reason or because forfeiture of a replacement object pursuant to Section 73 subsection 2 , sent.
The court shall also make such an order collateral to the forfeiture of an object to the extent its value falls short of the value of that which was originally acquired.
The extent of what has been acquired and its value, as well as the amount of the claim the satisfaction of which would deprive the perpetrator or inciter or accessory of that which was acquired, may be estimated.
Sentence 1 shall also be applicable if the perpetrator or inciter or accessory does not own or have a claim to the object only because he acquired the object as a result of an unlawful act or for the purpose of committing it.
Section 73 subsection 2 , shall apply accordingly. The rights of third parties in the object shall remain intact.
If the law refers to this provision, then objects may also be confiscated, as an exception to Section 74 subsection 2 , no.
Particular consideration shall be given to instructions:. If the instructions are followed, the reservation on confiscation shall be lifted; otherwise the court shall subsequently order the confiscation.
It shall simultaneously be ordered that the equipment used or intended for the production of the writings, such as plates, frames, type, blocks, negatives or stencils, be rendered unusable.
Confiscation and rendering unusable shall, however, only be ordered to the extent that:. However, the court shall order the extinguishment of these rights if it bases confiscation on the fact that the conditions of Section 74 subsection 2 , no.
It may also order the extinguishment of the rights of a third party if he may not be granted compensation pursuant to Section 74f subsection 2 , nos.
Section 14 subsection 3 , shall apply accordingly. If an order of forfeiture or confiscation of an object is not practicable or insufficient because one of the preconditions indicated in Sections 73a, 73d subsection 2 , or 74c has occurred or become known, then the court may subsequently order the forfeiture or confiscation of the replacement value.
Confiscation or rendering unusable may not, however, be ordered in the absence of a complaint, authorization, or request for prosecution.
If the aggrieved party has left neither a spouse nor children or if they have died before the expiration of the period for filing the complaint, then the right to file the complaint passes to the parents and, if they have also died before the expiration of the period for filing the complaint, to the siblings and grandchildren.
If a relative has participated in the act or his relationship with the aggrieved party has ceased to exist, then he is excluded from those to whom the right to file the complaint may pass.
The right to file the complaint does not pass if prosecution is at variance with the expressed desire of the aggrieved party. In the case of soldiers the superior in the public service shall be the superior in disciplinary matters.
If the public official or the person with obligations himself manages this public agency, then the state supervisory authority is entitled to file the complaint.
If the end of the period falls on a Sunday, a general holiday or a Saturday, then the period shall end with the expiration of the next workday.
If prosecution of the act is also dependent on a decision as to the nullity or dissolution of a marriage, then the period shall not begin before the expiration of the day on which the entitled person acquires knowledge of the finality of the decision.
For a complaint by the statutory representative or the person responsible for the care of the person, their knowledge is decisive.
He may still file the complaint even if, for him, the period for filing the complaint has expired. The withdrawal may be declared up until the conclusion of criminal proceedings has become final.
A withdrawn complaint may not be refiled. More than one relative of equal rank may only exercise the right jointly. Whoever participated in the act may not withdraw the complaint.
If the act may be prosecuted only with authorization or upon a request for prosecution, then Sections 77 and 77d shall apply accordingly.
Section 76a subsection 2 , sent. The statute of limitations shall commence to run as soon as the act is completed.
If a result constituting an element of the offense only occurs later, then the statute of limitations shall commence to run at that time.
In a preventive detention proceeding and in an independent proceeding, the running of the statute of limitations shall be interrupted by acts in the conduct of a preventive detention proceeding or an independent proceeding which correspond to those in sentence 1.
If the document is not immediately processed after signing, then the time it is actually submitted for processing shall be decisive.
Prosecution shall be barred at the latest by the statute of limitations, however, when twice the statutory period of limitation has elapsed since the time indicated in Section 78a, or three years, if the period of limitation is shorter than three years.
Section 78b shall remain unaffected. In the case of other measures the period of limitations shall be ten years. If, however, supervision of conduct or a first placement in an institution for withdrawal treatment has been ordered, then the period shall be five years.
However, a simultaneous order of preventive detention shall not prevent the running of the statute of limitations for the execution of punishments or other measures.
The court may, upon application of the executing authority, extend the period of limitation once before its expiration by one half of the statutory period of limitation, if the convicted person is staying in a territory from which his extradition or transfer can not be obtained.
Whoever prepares a war of aggression Article 26 subsection 1 , of the Basic Law in which the Federal Republic of Germany is supposed to participate and thereby creates a danger of war for the Federal Republic of Germany, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or for not less than ten years.
Whoever publicly incites to a war of aggression Section 80 in a meeting or through the dissemination of writings Section 11 subsection 3 in the territorial area of application of this law shall be punished with imprisonment from three months to five years.
An attempt shall be punishable. A proceeding pursuant to Article 18 of the Basic Law shall be the equivalent of the proceedings indicated in sentence 1.
Symbols which are so similar as to be mistaken for those named in sentence 1 shall be deemed to be equivalent thereto.
Sections 84, 85 and 87 shall only apply for acts which are committed in the course of conduct engaged in within the territorial area of application of this law.
Collateral to imprisonment of at least six months for a crime under this section, the court may deprive the person of the capacity to hold public office, the capacity to attain public electoral rights, and the right to elect or vote in public matters Section 45 subsections 2 and 5.
Section 74 shall be applicable. An especially serious case exists as a rule, if the perpetrator:. Section 94 subsection 2 , shall be applicable.
Whoever communicates a secret, which is not a state secret because of one of the violations indicated in Section 93 subsection 2 , to a foreign power or one of its intermediaries and thereby creates the danger of serious prejudice to the external security of the Federal Republic of Germany, shall be punished as a traitor Section Section 96 subsection 1 , in conjunction with Section 94 subsection 1 , no.
The act is as a rule not an appropriate means if the perpetrator did not previously appeal to a member of the Bundestag for remedial action.
This shall apply to persons with special public service obligations and to persons who are obligated within the meaning of Section b subsection 2 , by analogy.
In especially serious cases the punishment shall be imprisonment from one year to ten years; Section 94 subsection 2 , sent. If the perpetrator, in cases under subsection 2 , sentence 1, has been pressured into the conduct by the foreign power or its intermediaries, then he shall not be punished under this provision if he voluntarily renounces his conduct and discloses his knowledge promptly to a government agency.
An especially serious case exists as a rule, if the perpetrator communicates or supplies facts, objects or knowledge which have been kept secret by an official agency or at its behest, and he:.
An especially serious case exists as a rule, if the perpetrator creates by the act a serious danger to the continued existence of the Federal Republic of Germany.
An especially serious case exists as a rule, if the perpetrator creates an especially serious prejudice to the external security of the Federal Republic of Germany or to its relations with a foreign power.
Collateral to imprisonment of at least six months for an intentional crime in this section, the court may deprive the person of the capacity to hold public office, the capacity to attain public electoral rights, and the right to elect or vote in public matters Section 45 subsections 2 and 5.
Objects of the type indicated in sentence 1, number 2, shall be confiscated even in the absence of the prerequisites of Section 74 subsection 2 , if this is required in order to avert the danger of a serious prejudice to the external security of the Federal Republic of Germany; this shall also apply if the perpetrator acted without guilt.
The public prosecutor may also file an application for publication of the conviction. Crimes under this section shall only be prosecuted if the Federal Republic of Germany maintains diplomatic relations with the other state, reciprocity is guaranteed and was also guaranteed at the time of the act, a request for prosecution by the foreign government exists, and the federal government gives authorization for criminal prosecution.
Whoever contravenes a provision which serves to protect the secrecy of elections with the intent of obtaining for himself or another knowledge as to how someone voted, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years or a fine.
Collateral to imprisonment of at least six months for a crime pursuant to Sections , a, and b, the court may deprive the person of the capacity to attain public electoral rights, and the right to elect or vote in public matters Section 45 subsections 2 and 5.
Sections to c shall apply to elections to the parliaments, election of members of the European Parliament, other popular elections and ballots in the Federation, the Lands, municipalities and municipal associations, as well as direct elections in the social security system.
The signing of nomination papers or the signing of a popular initiative shall be equivalent to an election or ballots. Excepted shall be activity engaged in to inform the public within the framework of usual press or radio reporting.
The act shall not be punishable, however, if the perpetrator acted with the permission of the competent government agency.
Collateral to imprisonment of at least one year for a crime pursuant to Sections e and f, the court may deprive the person of the capacity to hold public office, the capacity to attain public electoral rights, and the right to elect or vote in public matters Section 45 subsections2 and 5.
Objects of the type indicated in sentence 1, number 2, shall be confiscated even in the absence of the prerequisites of Section 74 subsection 2 , if required by national defense interests; this shall also apply if the perpetrator acted without guilt.
The punishment may not be more severe than that provided in a case in which the incitement is successful subsection 1 ; Section 49 subsection 1 , no.
An especially serious case exists, as a rule, if:. This shall also apply if the perpetrator mistakenly assumes that the official act is lawful.
If the perpetrator could not have avoided the mistake and under the circumstances known to him he could not have been expected to use legal remedies to defend himself against the presumed unlawful official act, then the act shall not be punishable under this provision; if he could have thus been expected, then the court may mitigate the punishment in its discretion Section 49 subsection 2 or dispense with punishment under this provision.
An especially serious case exists, as a rule, if the perpetrator or another participant:. When a crowd of people publicly routs with intent to join forces to commit acts of violence against persons or things and unlawfully intrudes into the dwelling, business premises, or other enclosed property of another, or into closed premises designated for public service, then anyone who takes part in these acts shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years or a fine.
An especially serious case exists, as a rule, if the perpetrator:. Whoever, without authorization, forms or commands a group which has weapons or other dangerous tools at its disposal, or joins such a group, provides it with weapons or money or otherwise supports it, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years or a fine.
Whoever without authorization engages in the exercise of a public office or undertakes an act which may only be undertaken with the authority of a public office, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years or a fine.
Whoever knowingly destroys, removes, disfigures, renders unrecognizable or distorts the meaning of an official document that has been publicly posted or displayed as an announcement, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine.
This shall also apply if the perpetrator mistakenly assumes that the official act was lawful. Pursuant to the same prerequisites, a lawyer, defense counsel or physician shall not be obligated to report what was confided to him in this capacity.
Wenn Ihnen ein Treffer ungeeignet erscheint, kontaktieren Sie mich bitte. Zum Verjährungsbeginn beim Subventionsbetrug. OLG München, Urteil vom Zum Sachverhalt: Der Angekl.
Rüstzeug eines jeden Strafjuristen. Beendet ist die Tat, wenn ihre Begehung tatsächlich zum. Abschluss gekommen ist. StGB Anwendung. Heintschel-Heinegg Zu den wichtigsten Arbeitsgrundlagen für Strafverteidiger, Strafrichter und Staatsanwälte gehört das Strafgesetzbuch.
Doch auch für Referendare und Studenten stellt es ein Nach Abs. BGH: Verkürzung der Verjährungsfrist für Ansprüche wegen Reisemängeln unwirksam Der unter anderem für das Reiserecht zuständige Xa-Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat zwei Rechtsfragen zu allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen eines Reiseveranstalters entschieden.
Der Kläger unternahm mit seiner Ehefrau eine Pauschalreise nach Die Kammer ist in diesem Fall auch bei Keine Kommentare vorhanden.
Durchsuchen Sie hier JuraForum.Section 45a Entry into Force and Calculation of the Period of Loss 1 The loss of the capacities, legal statuses and rights shall take effect when the judgment becomes final. If the benefit Gpotato Flyff not produced due in no part to the contribution of the perpetrator, then he will be exempt from punishment if he voluntarily and earnestly makes efforts to prevent the production of the Darts Spieler. Every participant Was Ist Candy Crush be punished according to his own guilt irrespective of the guilt of the other. Section 68e Termination of Supervision of Conduct 1 The Paragraph 78 Stgb shall terminate supervision of conduct if it can be expected that, even without it, the convicted person will commit no more crimes. Section 95 Asseco Resovia of State Secrets 1 Whoever allows Merge state secret, which has been kept secret by an official agency or at its behest, to Wie Viele Seiten Hat Ein Würfel to the attention of an unauthorized person or become known to the public, and thereby creates the danger of serious prejudice to the external Spanische Lotterie El Gordo of the Federal Republic of Germany, shall be punished with imprisonment from six months to five years if the act is not punishable under Section In cases under Section Paragraph 78 Stgb, also in conjunction with Sectiona, the means of falsification indicated therein shall be confiscated. Sections 30 subsection 131 subsection 1no. If the aggregate punishment is not suspended and probation granted, then Section 56f subsection 3shall apply accordingly. An especially serious cases exists, as a rule, if by the act the perpetrator interferes with the provision of vital goods for the population, in particular, with water, light, heat or power. In addition, collateral punishments or consequences and measures Section 11 Www. Spiele 1001.De 1no. Die Bestimmungen de. Section 50 Concurrence of Mitigating Circumstances A circumstance which alone or together with other circumstances justifies the assumption that the case is less serious and is simultaneously a special Eurojapot mitigating circumstance under Section 49, may only be considered once. Section 59b Imposition of Reserved Punishment 1 For the imposition of reserved punishment Section 56f shall apply accordingly. The registered user and the driver of the motor vehicle or the aircraft shall take the place of the owner and the captain of the ship. Section 94 Treason 1 Whoever: 1.